Building Innovation: NIBS’ Highest Honor is The Mortimer M. Marshall Lifetime Achievement Award. Who Gets Your Vote?
Natural disasters are growing in frequency and strength.
Thankfully, there are measures that communities, local governments, land owners, developers, and tenants can take to reduce the impact of these hazards. Mitigation protects lives, improves safety, prevents property loss, and decreases disruption of daily life.
The Natural Hazard Mitigation Saves: 2019 Report represents the most exhaustive benefit-cost analysis of natural hazard mitigation, from adopting up-to-date building codes and exceeding codes to addressing the retrofit of existing buildings and utility and transportation infrastructure. It was funded by the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD). Earlier editions of the report were funded by the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA), U.S. Economic Development Administration (EDA), International Code Council (ICC), Insurance Institute for Business and Home Safety (IBHS), American Institute of Architects (AIA), and National Fire Protection Association (NFPA).
In 2005, the National Institute of Building Sciences Multi-Hazard Mitigation Council released the initial Natural Hazard Mitigation Saves study, which looked at the value of utilizing federal grants to assist with mitigation. The project was made possible through funding from FEMA.
Subsequent mitigation findings are detailed in past reports:
These findings provide the estimated national average benefit-cost ratio for five types of mitigation and perils, as shown below. Please note BCRs can vary geographically and can be much higher in some places.
The goal of Mitigation Saves is to help communities, building owners, and officials in the private finance, insurance, and real estate industries initiate a greater mitigation dialogue. We also aim to assist Congress and policymakers to develop effective federal programs that support pre-disaster mitigation and encourage more mitigation investments from the public and private sectors.
Thirteen national experts developed the methodology with oversight by four committees, with a combined membership of 24 independent experts, who peer-reviewed the work and confirmed the results. In total, about 130 participants across 70 organizations, including the Office of Management and Budget (OMB), FEMA, HUD, EDA, and subject matter experts from the National Institute of Building Sciences under MMC, participated in these studies.